In a surprising twist that has caused a lot of excitement in the gaming industry, court documents revealed during the ongoing trial between Google and Epic Games have uncovered Google’s ambitious plans to buy Epic Games. These documents show that Google not only wanted to acquire Epic Games, but also involve Tencent, a Chinese company, as a major shareholder in the deal.

Epic Games, the creators of the hugely popular Fortnite, has firmly established itself as a dominant force in the gaming world, with a valuation of $32 billion. This level of success has naturally attracted the attention of big players in the industry who want more control over the company and access its huge potential.

The leaked emails show that Google initially wanted to fully acquire Epic Games. However, realizing the importance of a strong partner, Google turned to Tencent, which already owns 40% of Epic Games. The plan was to form a strategic alliance with Tencent, with the goal of either fully owning the company or buying Epic shares directly from Tencent.

It seems Google’s motivation for these discussions was to counterbalance Tencent’s significant influence over Epic Games. To ensure a fair distribution of power, Google even considered involving another strategic investor. This approach aimed to prevent Tencent from having too much control over Epic Games’ decision-making.

Former Google director Dav Sabota played a major role in championing the idea of involving Tencent in the acquisition plans. In one of the emails, Sabota emphasized the potential benefits of partnering with Tencent, highlighting their expertise in the gaming industry.

However, as the trial has progressed, it has become clear that these acquisition plans never went beyond the initial discussions. Subsequent emails have shown that the proposed collaboration between Google and Tencent didn’t happen, and Epic Games remains unaffected by Google’s attempts to acquire it.

The revelation of these acquisition plans has sparked a passionate debate within the gaming community about the possible consequences of such a merger. Supporters argue that Google’s involvement could have brought more financial resources and technological advancements to Epic Games, driving further innovation and growth. However, critics are concerned about the impact on the company’s independence and creative freedom.

Both Google and Epic Games have chosen not to make official statements about these exposed acquisition plans. However, industry insiders speculate that the revelation could strain the relationship between Tencent and Epic Games, given Google’s unsuccessful attempt to involve Tencent in the acquisition.

As the trial continues, the gaming community eagerly awaits further developments and considers the possible implications of these acquisition plans on the gaming industry. While Google’s ambitions to acquire Epic Games may have been stopped, the documents shed light on the complex dynamics and power struggles within the gaming industry.

In the ever-changing gaming world, where big players compete for dominance, the revelation of Google’s failed attempt to acquire Epic Games gives us a glimpse into the fierce battle for control in this thriving sector. As the trial unfolds, gaming enthusiasts remain engaged, eagerly anticipating the impact these revelations may have on the future of Epic Games and the broader gaming industry.